About Not a public authority under FOIA; a subject access request (UK GDPR Art 15) is the statutory route.
Not a public authority under FOIA; a subject access request (UK GDPR Art 15) is the statutory route. Escalation: Legal Ombudsman (service) / the regulator (conduct). Court: County Court or High Court: compliance order (Data Protection Act 2018 s.167). Correspondence: 5 emails (4 sent, 1 received).
📍 Checked in at: FOI request
Next step (forecast): reply or refusal notice, 13 Nov 2026
I asked legal regulators for guidance on tracing any barristers or chambers that acted in the 1980s BP Properties Ltd v Buckler land litigation over Great House Farm, and requested preservation of relevant records.
“guidance on tracing barristers or chambers that may have acted in that matter, and for preservation of any relevant records”
We acknowledge your email and ask you to contact us with a specific question before we can help, noting we won't respond further if other recipients are copied in.
I describe my family's centuries-old farm near Cardiff, lost to BP, my father's failed appeal and blocked ECHR claim before his death in 1991, and question whether ownership was ever properly determined in court.
“Ownership was never determined in a court. Possession was saught but BP never saught clarification on the true owners.”
I ask whether a historical land dispute involving reliance on registered title and inconsistent judicial reasoning about party identity might interest you from a professional or law-reform standpoint.
“reliance on registered title obtained prior to definitive adjudication, and subsequent judicial reasoning that appears internally inconsistent”
The family raises a historical concern about the BP vs Buckler land registration case from 1982, asking only whether such a scenario interests regulators from a professional standards or historical practice perspective, without seeking advice or action.