About Members of Parliament and select committees are outside FOIA and EIR; the ladder is letters, chasers and a standards complaint.
Members of Parliament and select committees are outside FOIA and EIR; the ladder is letters, chasers and a standards complaint. Escalation: Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards. Correspondence: 15 emails (5 sent, 10 received).
I confirm I have received your request for a referral to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman regarding the HM Land Registry complaint, case ref KN806, and have logged it for a response.
“your message has been logged, and I’ll respond as soon as I can”
Thank you for clarifying that Dinas Powys falls outside your constituency; following your suggestion, the request for a Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman referral over title WA231076 has gone to the MP for Cardiff South and Penarth, and HM Land Registry's Independent Complaints Reviewer is now reviewing it under ref ICR/090/26, so no action is needed from your office.
“HM Land Registry's Independent Complaints Reviewer is also now considering the complaint (ref ICR/090/26)”
I am sharing the Great House Farm Wiki, a public archive documenting 150 years of the farm's history in Llandough-juxta-Penarth, drawing on Glamorgan Archives, tithe records, maps, leases and family papers, and inviting you to explore and share it.
“The archive documents the 150-year history of Great House Farm in Llandough-juxta-Penarth, South Wales”
I confirm I have received your email seeking to set aside the 1987 BP v Buckler decision on grounds including a disputed paper title, identity concerns and procedural unfairness, and have logged it.
“your message has been logged, and I’ll respond as soon as I can”
The MP's office confirmed receipt of the email about Title WA231076 and explained that casework is only taken up for constituents of the Vale of Glamorgan, asking for full name, address and case details so a caseworker can respond.
“I can only take up casework for people living in the Vale of Glamorgan”
I confirm I have received your email about title concerns and procedural concealment at Church View Close, formerly Great House Farm/Ty Mawr, and have logged it for a response.
“your message has been logged, and I’ll respond as soon as I can”
I confirm I have received your email about systemic governance concerns over historic land registration and administrative reliance, including the 1982 BP Land Registry matter, and have logged it for reply.
“your message has been logged, and I’ll respond as soon as I can”
I confirm I have received your request for a petition and public inquiry into the Buckler v BP 1987 case and the destruction of Great House Farm, and your message has been logged for a response.
“your message has been logged, and I’ll respond as soon as I can”
I ask you to pose a Parliamentary Question on the case or land registration policy, request a debate on historical property disputes, and refer me to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman over possible maladministration by a public body.
“Refer me to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman”
We confirm receipt of your further email requesting an inquiry and petition over the Great House Farm case and repeat our standard casework requirements and constituency rules.
“I can only take up casework for people living in the Vale of Glamorgan”
We explain that Dinas Powys falls outside the Vale of Glamorgan constituency, so we cannot help, and we give you the MP for Cardiff South and Penarth's contact details as your correct MP.
“Dinas Powys unfortunately does not fall within the Vale of Glamorgan Parliamentary Constituency”
I write as a constituent asking you to help identify legal, historical or governmental bodies that could independently review BP Properties Ltd v Buckler (1987), concerning Great House Farm, Llandough, and its heritage significance.
“requesting your help in identifying the appropriate bodies—legal, historical, or governmental”