Representative (role)
5 posts · 2026
Members of Parliament and select committees are outside FOIA and EIR; the ladder is letters, chasers and a standards complaint. Escalation: Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards. Correspondence: 5 emails (2 sent, 3 received).
📍 Checked in at: Written evidence / letter to the committee
Next step (forecast): request, 26 Oct 2026
Every option used up (forecast): 24 June 2027
No public statements found yet; the record below involves them.
We confirm that this matter falls outside the Committee's remit, which covers constitutional issues, the standards of Civil Service administration, and reports of the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman.
“Unfortunately, this is not a matter within the remit of the Committee.”
We reiterate that the Committee cannot review individual cases, including PHSO decisions, and suggest contacting the PHSO directly or your local MP for support.
“The Committee cannot review the PHSO's decisions about individual cases.”
We contest the remit decision, arguing the case concerns constitutional overreach and failures in land registration, heritage protection and public record-keeping, and ask the Committee to review it under its constitutional and administrative mandate.
Seen ✓ · answered 5 Feb 2026
We confirm receipt of your correspondence and note that the Committee does not investigate individual cases, focusing instead on constitutional issues, civil service administration and PHSO reports.
“The Committee does not investigate individual cases and therefore we are unable to offer help to individuals with personal matters.”
We outline a 1974–1987 chronology of a land dispute, including a 1982 BP land registration and the 1987 Court of Appeal ruling, and ask the Committee to treat it as a systemic governance concern, not a request for remedial action.
“My purpose is solely to provide factual information for consideration, rather than to request remedial action.”
Seen ✓ · answered 31 Jan 2026
